home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 94 04:30:05 PST
- From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
- Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
- Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
- Precedence: Bulk
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #235
- To: Info-Hams
-
-
- Info-Hams Digest Fri, 4 Mar 94 Volume 94 : Issue 235
-
- Today's Topics:
- Help: Neighbor's CW interference
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: 3 Mar 1994 15:30:15 -0600
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Help: Neighbor's CW interference
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I'm not a radio operator, just trying to get along with one. Need advice on
- how to eliminate neighbor's 100 watt 10 meter CW transmissions from my house
- intercom speakers. Only thing that works is turning down the volume at each
- speaker, then we can't hear the doorbell since it's part of the
- intercom/radio. We have put a hi-pass filter on the FM lead, disconnected the
- AM lead, soldered .01mf caps across the speaker terminals, and grounded his
- antenna to an 8' copper clad rod. Nothing works. I'm betting some of the
- ARRL guys on the net have the answer. Any ideas?
- Thanks very much!
-
- Sam Watson | watson@lobby.ti.com
- Texas Instruments |
- Dallas Texas | (214)995-4590
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 1994 19:03:30 GMT
- From: news.acns.nwu.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!odin!chuck.dallas.sgi.com!adams@network.ucsd.edu
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- References <CL2uBt.8qr@srgenprp.sr.hp.com>, <CLwrFv.M1o@odin.corp.sgi.com>, <2l3aqg$h6o@ivy.bga.com>om
- Subject : Re: Copying High-Speed CW: Print or Script?
-
- In article <2l3aqg$h6o@ivy.bga.com>, davros@bga.com (Buddy Brannan) writes:
- |> AAARRRRRGH!!!!
- |>
- |> Now why, pray tell, would someone want to write down cw at hi speed?!??!?
- ...stuff deleted
- |> Head copy! Is it a lost ... h'mm. Well, do people head copy anymore?
- |> Besides me, I mean?
- |> --
- |> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV | God is love.
- |> Riff-Raff #4 | Love is blind.
- |> Internet: davros@bga.com | Buddy is blind.
- |> davros@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu | Buddy is God.
-
- i still copy "in the head" at high speeds above 45 wpm and mobile cw.
- i do like to write everything down below 45 wpm for : a) practice, b) keep
- record of qso in case i wanna write some letter/note with qsl card,
- and c) not lose the skill. use it or lose it. :-)
-
- dit dit
- --
- Chuck Adams K5FO CP-60
- adams@sgi.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #235
- ******************************
-